🔗 Share this article

The composer Avril Coleridge-Taylor constantly felt the pressure of her parent’s legacy. As the daughter of Samuel Coleridge-Taylor, among the most famous UK musicians of the early 20th century, her identity was cloaked in the lingering obscurity of bygone eras.

The First Recording

In recent months, I sat with these shadows as I prepared to produce the inaugural album of her 1936 piano concerto. Featuring emotional harmonies, heartfelt tunes, and bold rhythms, Avril’s work will offer audiences valuable perspective into how she – a wartime composer who entered the world in 1903 – envisioned her existence as a female composer of color.

Shadows and Truth

However about legacies. One needs patience to adjust, to recognize outlines as they truly exist, to separate fact from misinterpretation, and I had been afraid to face the composer’s background for a while.

I had so wanted the composer to be her father’s daughter. To some extent, this was true. The pastoral English palettes of her father’s impact can be heard in several pieces, including From the Hills (1934) and Sussex Landscape (1940). However, one need only examine the headings of her parent’s works to see how he heard himself as not only a flag bearer of British Romantic style but a representative of the African diaspora.

It was here that father and daughter began to differ.

The United States judged Samuel by the brilliance of his music rather than the his racial background.

Parental Heritage

While he was studying at the prestigious music college, her father – the son of a parent from Sierra Leone and a white English mother – began embracing his African roots. Once the African American poet this literary figure came to London in 1897, the aspiring artist actively pursued him. He adapted this literary work into music and the next year used the poet’s words for an opera, Dream Lovers. This was followed by the choral piece that put Samuel on the map: Hiawatha’s Wedding Feast.

Drawing from Henry Wadsworth Longfellow’s The Song of Hiawatha, the piece was an international hit, particularly among the Black community who felt indirect honor as the majority assessed his work by the excellence of his art rather than the his background.

Activism and Politics

Success did not temper Samuel’s politics. At the turn of the century, he participated in the initial Pan African gathering in England where he made the acquaintance of the Black American thinker the renowned Du Bois and observed a series of speeches, covering the mistreatment of African people in South Africa. He was an activist to his final days. He sustained relationships with trailblazers for equality like this intellectual and Booker T Washington, gave addresses on equality for all, and even discussed matters of race with President Theodore Roosevelt on a trip to the US capital in the early 1900s. Regarding his compositions, the scholar reflected, “he established his reputation so prominently as a creative artist that it cannot soon be forgotten.” He died in the early 20th century, at 37 years old. However, how would the composer have made of his offspring’s move to work in this country in the mid-20th century?

Conflict and Policy

“Child of Celebrated Artist expresses approval to South African policy,” ran a headline in the community journal Jet magazine. Apartheid “appeared to me the appropriate course”, Avril told Jet. When asked to explain, she qualified her remarks: she didn’t agree with this policy “fundamentally” and it “ought to be permitted to resolve itself, guided by good-intentioned South Africans of all races”. If Avril had been more in tune to her family’s principles, or from Jim Crow America, she may have reconsidered about apartheid. Yet her life had shielded her.

Identity and Naivety

“I have a English document,” she remarked, “and the officials did not inquire me about my race.” Therefore, with her “porcelain-white” skin (according to the magazine), she moved among the Europeans, lifted by their acclaim for her deceased parent. She gave a talk about her parent’s compositions at the Cape Town university and directed the broadcasting ensemble in that location, programming the heroic third movement of her concerto, named: “Dedicated to my Father.” Although a skilled pianist on her own, she avoided playing as the featured artist in her work. Instead, she consistently conducted as the maestro; and so the apartheid orchestra performed under her direction.

Avril hoped, according to her, she “might bring a shift”. However, by that year, circumstances deteriorated. Once officials became aware of her Black ancestry, she had to depart the nation. Her UK document didn’t protect her, the UK representative recommended her departure or be jailed. She went back to the UK, embarrassed as the magnitude of her innocence became clear. “This experience was a hard one,” she lamented. Adding to her disgrace was the printing that year of her controversial discussion, a year after her unceremonious exit from the country.

A Common Narrative

While I reflected with these shadows, I perceived a known narrative. The account of identifying as British until it’s challenged – which recalls Black soldiers who served for the English throughout the global conflict and lived only to be denied their due compensation. And the Windrush generation,