🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of commenters applauding your advice on expanding your venture? Do recruiters making contact to explore collaborations?

If not, the reason might be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Changing Profile Gender to achieve Better Visibility

Numerous women participated in an organized professional network test this week after viral posts suggested that changing their profile gender to "male" boosted their network presence.

Some participants modified their professional summaries to include what they called "masculine-oriented" language - adding action-focused professional jargon like "propel", "transform" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their exposure similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Questions Raised

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether an inherent sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm favors male users who use professional networking terminology.

Like many large social media platforms, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to decide which posts appear to which users - boosting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but claimed it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when determining content distribution. Instead, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your posts shows up in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "Simon E", reported extraordinary results.

"The numbers I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she noted.

Another professional, a communications strategist, began experimenting after observing her audience decrease significantly.

The Process

• First, she modified her profile gender to "male"
• Then, she used AI tools to rewrite her profile using "masculine-oriented" language
• Lastly, she repurposed previous content with similar "agentic" language

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.

The Downside

Despite the positive results, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the method.

"Previously, my posts were softer - brief and insightful, but also friendly and relatable," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was forceful and self-assured - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She discontinued the experiment after seven days, saying "Every day I persisted, and results improved, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Some testers experienced favorable outcomes. One writer who changed both her profile gender to "male" and her race to "Caucasian" reported a decrease in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it operates in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Broader Implications

These experiments occur alongside continuing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in the past few months have reportedly caused female creators experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in informal experiments where identical content by men and women received dramatically unequal reach.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to categorize and spread content based on various elements, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company states it frequently assesses its systems, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

Company representative suggested that recent declines in certain members' visibility might originate from higher volume due to additional posts on the platform.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester observed, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."